Psy-Ed Corporation v. KLEIN HIRSCH

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that, in light of G. L. c. 151B's remedial purpose, it would be error to impose \current employee\ as modifier where statute addresses action taken by \any person\ 18 against \another person\ and statutory language does not require limitation
• \ulterior purpose element is not satisfied merely by a showing that a person commenced litigation knowing it was groundless\
• \A claim of retaliation may succeed even if the underlying claim of discrimination fails.\
• Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 151B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).