Psomas v. Psomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the Supreme Court had recognized the exception in dictum in Fitzgerald, v. Valdez, 77 N.M. 769, 776, 427 P.2d 655, 659 (1967) requiring support for incapacitated adult children
• statute is presumed to operate prospectively unless clear intention exists to give act retroactive effect
• operation of statute is prospective unless retroactive effect clearly intended by legislature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).