Skip to main content
· 6/9/1972

Przybylski v. Yellow Cab Co.

Citations

  • 285 N.E.2d 506
  • 6 Ill. App. 3d 243
  • 1972 Ill. App. LEXIS 2478

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the defendant-taxicab company, as a common carrier, owed the plaintiff-passenger “the duty to use the highest degree of care consistent with the mode of conveyance and the practical operation thereof, and was responsible for any departure from that high standard”
  • noting that the defendant-taxicab company, as a common carrier, owed the plaintiff-passenger “the duty to use the highest degree of care consistent with the mode of conveyance and the practical operation thereof, and was responsible for any departure from that high standard”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: English

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.