Skip to main content

Pryor v. State

Citations

  • 48 So. 3d 159
  • 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 17922
  • 2010 WL 4723042

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a motion for judgment of acquittal did not raise defendant’s knowledge and was therefore insufficient to address that element in a charge of tampering with evidence
  • holding a 10 motion for judgment of acquittal did not raise defendant’s knowledge and was therefore insufficient to address that element in a charge of tampering with evidence
  • finding that a motion for judgment of acquittal that failed to challenge knowledge, an element of the charge of tampering with evidence, was insufficient to preserve the issue for appeal
  • finding a motion for judgment of acquittal that failed to raise the defendant’s knowledge insufficient to address that element in a charge of tampering with evidence
  • finding a motion for judgment of acquittal that failed to raise the 5 defendant’s knowledge insufficient to address that element in a charge of tampering with evidence
  • finding reversible misconduct where a juror looked up a word related to the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kahn, Webster, Wolf

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.