Pryor v. M'Nairy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• criticizing Tulare for failing to adequately consider whether the contracts were limited in the event of water shortage by prior contracts, prior appropriations, or other state law principles
• criticizing Tulare for failing to adequately consider whether the contracts were limited in the event of water shortage by prior contracts, prior appropriations, or other state law principles
• dismissing takings claims because they were based on rights created by contracts with the government, which may be vindicated only under contract law
• “Over time, many of the above-referenced contracts were subsumed and supplanted by contracts between the United States or the Bureau and various water districts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).