Prussing v. General Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff’s “belated attempt to file an affidavit in opposition was in such form and manner that the judge’s failure to treat it as a timely opposing affidavit was not an abuse of discretion”
• noting the societal need to balance the competing interests in an employment contract for “the best interest of the economic system or the public good”
• “Prussing’s belated attempt to file an affidavit in opposition was in such form and manner that the judge’s failure to treat it as a timely opposing affidavit was not an abuse of discretion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).