Prunte v. Universal Music Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing all claims by co-plaintiff company because it was an artificial entity not represented -by counsel
• declining to conduct substantial-similarity analysis at motion-to-dismiss stage where plaintiff alleged that defendants infringed on plaintiff’s lyrics
• “[The] Supreme Court has refused to imply a private right of action in a 5 bare criminal statute.”
• “[The] Supreme Court has refused to imply a private right of action in a bare criminal statute.”
• “[The] Supreme Court has refused to imply a private right of action in a bare criminal statute.”
• “[The] Supreme Court has refused to imply a private right of action in a bare criminal statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).