Prunier v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of active drug dealing, together with the affiant's statement that drug dealers commonly use multiple cell phones to conceal their business, supported a fair inference that the phones would contain evidence of drug dealing
• declining to apply plain error review and finding waived a claim covered by Rule 12 that was not raised below, and as to which good cause did not exist to excuse the failure

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).