Skip to main content
· 4/13/1998

Pruitt v. Bowers

Citations

  • 499 S.E.2d 250
  • 330 S.C. 483
  • 1998 S.C. App. LEXIS 57

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating the appeal of an amendment order was interlocutory and generally would not have been appealable except that it accompanied an appeal from the grant of summary judgment
  • declining to rule on interlocutory order where trial court had not had an opportunity to rule on the sufficiency of the allegations in the pleadings and stating “[a]rguments going to the legal merits of the proposed pleadings are better taken up in the context of a Rule12(b

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Howell, Cureton, Howard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.