Skip to main content
· 1/19/1999

Pruitt Corp. v. Strahley

Citations

  • 510 S.E.2d 821
  • 270 Ga. 430
  • 14 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1326
  • 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 365
  • 1999 Ga. LEXIS 52

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because [defendant] was not a stranger to [plaintiffs contract], [defendant] was entitled to summary judgment.”
  • claim for tortious interference with contractual relations requires proof that the defendant is a stranger to the contract with which the defendant allegedly interfered and to the business relationship giving rise to the contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thompson, Hines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.