Pruit v. Clack

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “when a procurement involves performance standards ... a court must grant even more deference to the evaluator’s decision[,] ... a triple whammy of deference”
• noting that past performance evaluations in this type of procurement are accorded a “triple whammy of deference”
• stating that “when a procurement involves performance standards ... a court must grant even more deference to the evaluator’s decision!,] ... a triple whammy of deference”
• stating that “when a procurement involves performance standards ... a court must grant even more deference to the evaluator’s decision ... a triple whammy of deference”
• noting that agencies are afforded “broad discretion” in evaluating past performance
• noting that agencies are afforded “broad discretion” in past performance evaluations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).