Prudhomme v. Salamander Fire Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no violation of McCoy based on counsel’s concession that the defendant directed a shooting, where both the defendant and his counsel maintained his innocence “but disagreed about the best course to attempt to avoid conviction”
• “While the Court well understands Rosemond’s contention that the narrow holding of McCoy should be extended beyond capital cases and that this question will be resolved in due course by appellate courts, there is no need to decide it here.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).