Prudential Securities Inc. v. Hornsby

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[i]t is axiomatic that the purchase and sale of securities relates to interstate commerce”
• finding second arbitration filing “attempt to augment and modify the first arbitration award” and, therefore, “an impermissible collateral attack on his previous arbitration award.”
• finding allegedly independent fraud claim was “in reality, an attempt to augment and modify the first arbitration award”
• finding second arbitration filing “attempt to augment and modify the first arbitration award” and, therefore, “an. impermissible collateral attack on his previous arbitration award,”
• enjoining second arbitration where the “claim is premised entirely on the [sic] Prudential’s fraudulent concealment of documents from the original arbitration panel, misconduct in the proceeding itself”
• refusing an “attempt to arbitrate an ‘independent’ fraud claim” that was “premised entirely on [alleged] fraudulent concealment of documents from the original arbitration panel, misconduct in the proceedings itself”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).