· 8/25/1986
Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. Lawrence
Citations
- 724 P.2d 418
- 45 Wash. App. 111
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- considering the allegations in the complaint to assess whether insurer had a duty to defend
- considering the allegations in the complaint to assess whether insurer had a duty to defend
- obstruction of view is property damage where policy definition required \injury to tangible property\, not \physical injury to tangible property\
- “The 4 settlement agreement itself specified only that it involved ‘all claims’ of the parties. 5 Consequently, the trial court did not err in ordering [the insurer] to pay the entire settlement.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.