Skip to main content
· 8/25/1986

Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. Lawrence

Citations

  • 724 P.2d 418
  • 45 Wash. App. 111

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering the allegations in the complaint to assess whether insurer had a duty to defend
  • considering the allegations in the complaint to assess whether insurer had a duty to defend
  • obstruction of view is property damage where policy definition required \injury to tangible property\, not \physical injury to tangible property\
  • “The 4 settlement agreement itself specified only that it involved ‘all claims’ of the parties. 5 Consequently, the trial court did not err in ordering [the insurer] to pay the entire settlement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.