PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY & CASUALTY INS. v. Kollar

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant's plea of guilty to aggravated arson not conclusive on insurer's attempt to disclaim coverage in subsequent subrogation action brought on behalf of victim
• holding insured not estopped from relitigating intent for purposes of coverage despite guilty plea to arson
• plea of guilty to aggravated arson not conclusive on insurer's attempt to disclaim coverage in subsequent subrogation action brought on behalf of victim
• plea of guilty to aggravated arson does not establish that defendant intended specific property damage that resulted
• \A plea proceeding is not ... a full and fair litigation of the issues.\
• insurer had duty to defend even though insured had pled guilty to arson

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).