Skip to main content
· 5/17/1984

Prudential Insurance v. Eslick

Citations

  • 586 F. Supp. 763
  • 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 16617

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the existence of a de facto fiduciary relationship is a question of fact and depends on the circumstances of each case
  • stating that the existence of a de facto fiduciary relationship is a question of fact and depends on the circumstances of each case
  • stating that the existence of a de facto fiduciary relationship is a question of fact and depends on the circumstances of each case
  • stating that whether a de facto fiduciary relationship has been created “is a question of fact and depends on the circumstances of each case.”
  • characterizing a duty based on one party’s superior knowledge as arising from a “de facto fiduciary relationship,” and noting that “the existence of a de facto fiduciary relationship is a question of fact and depends on the circumstances of each case.”
  • \The existence of a de facto fiduciary relationship is a question of fact and depends on the circumstances of the case.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Spiegel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.