Skip to main content
· 4/10/1985

Prudential Ins. Co. of America v. Crouch

Citations

  • 606 F. Supp. 464
  • 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20877

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The duty of an employee to a former employer must be considered alongside the common-law right of an employee to compete against his former employer . . . [The employee’s duty] does not abrogate the right to compete, even ‘steal’ clients following termination of employment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dillin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.