Skip to main content
· 2/26/1975

Provo v. Bunker Hill Company

Citations

  • 393 F. Supp. 778

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • even knowingly permitting a hazardous work condition to exist was not an intentional act sufficient to give the employee a common law remedy against his employer.
  • even knowingly permitting a hazardous work condition to exist was not an intentional act sufficient to give the employee a common law remedy against his employer.
  • dual capacity doctrine recognized but not adopted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: J. Blaine Anderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.