Provini v. Asbestospray Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the evidence presented by the plaintiff fell short of the required “proof of frequency and intensity of plaintiff’s contacts with a particular manufacturer’s friable asbestos”
• holding that the evidence presented by the plaintiff fell short of the required “proof of frequency and intensity of plaintiff’s contacts with a particular manufacturer’s friable asbestos”
• indicating the court would not assume that a plaintiff was exposed to a product because the product was used by the plaintiff's employer during the brief time he was employed
• indicating the court would not assume that a plaintiff was exposed to a product because the product was used by the plaintiff's employer during the brief time he was employed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).