Provident Trust Co. v. City of Spokane
Citations
- 63 Wash. 92
- 114 P. 1030
- 1911 Wash. LEXIS 1162
Syllabus
<p>Dedication — Streets — Boundaries — Intent — Presumption. _ Where a plat plainly marked the boundaries of two parallel streets of specified widths, and showed an intervening space of twenty feet between the streets, marked “R. R.,” which was occupied at the time by a street railway, a dedication of the public streets as marked does not include the intervening space, since an intention to dedicate will not be presumed and does not appear; and a clause reserving from streets dedicated, the 20 foot strip marked “R. R.” will not defeat the expressed intent not to dedicate such strip.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing claim for wrongful termination in violation of company policy against storing a gun in a locked vehicle in the company parking lot that itself violated a state statute expressly prohibiting employers from enacting such a policy
- observing there was no need to “judicially graft another ‘exception’ to the employment-at-will doctrine . . . because the Legislature already has”
- “either party may terminate the employment at will, and the parties ‘may have a good reason, a wrong reason, or no reason for terminating the employment contract.’”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gose
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.