Provident National Assurance Co. v. Sbrocca

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that guarantors of a nonrecourse loan could be held liable to a lender based on their agreement to unconditionally guarantee what would otherwise be a nonrecourse promissory note
• determining based on similar contract language “any rights that Provident may or may not have had against RCL 1 The minute entry mistakenly lists Claim 13 as “Breach of Contract – September 17, [sic] 2014 Promissory Note” but then cites the correct contract date (September 10, 2014
• “The nature and extent of a guarantor’s liability depends upon the terms of the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).