Provident Life & Accident Insurance v. Fleischer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Since the jury’s award of statutory damages is a 27 manifest error of law, Defendant is not precluded from raising the issue in its 59(e) motion[.]”
• “Given the disparity in terms of 27 comprehensiveness of the remedy sought, state law claims substantially predominate over 28 the ADA for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(2).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).