Provident Bank & Trust Co. v. Saxon
Citations
- 123 La. 243
- 48 So. 922
- 1909 La. LEXIS 701
Syllabus
<p>Constitutional Law (§ 154*) — Obligation ot Contracts — Corporations.</p> <p>Act No. 120, p. 281, of 1904, entitled “An act recognizing the validity of corporations heretofore attempted to be formed under the laws of this state and providing that the validity of their acts and contracts shall be the same as if said corporations had been always valid,” is hold, for reasons assigned, to be not unconstitutional as impairing the obligations of contracts.</p> <p>[Ed. Note. — For other cases, see Constitutional Law, Cent. Dig. §§ 467, 469; Dec. Dig. § 154.*]</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining plaintiff 16 claiming age discrimination under the ADEA is not required to show age was the “but-for” 17 cause of the adverse employment action on summary judgment
- finding 20 employer’s failure to document meetings with employee or add anything to employee’s 21 personnel file regarding his productivity issues, which was one of the asserted reasons for 22 his termination, was evidence of pretext
- “Exhausting 19 administrative remedies by filing a timely charge with the EEOC or the appropriate state 20 agency is a statutory pre-requisite for an employee to pursue litigation under both Title VII 21 and the ADEA.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nicholls
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.