PROVIDENT BANK OF MARYLAND v. McCarthy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an imputed interest payment sought by a former employee was a “wage” within the meaning of the Wage Act, because “[plaintiffs] entitlement to the Imputed Interest payment was conditioned solely upon his performance.”
• holding that an imputed interest payment sought by a former employee was a “wage” within the meaning of the Wage Act, because “[plaintiffs] entitlement to the Imputed Interest payment was conditioned solely upon his performance.”
• finding that an imputed interest payment conditioned in part on the employee’s termination without cause qualified as wages under the WPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).