Providence Journal Co. v. Travelers Indemnity Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that no justiciable action for indemnity was kept alive because of the mere possibility of future CERCLA actions not yet brought against the insured
• holding that a pollution exclusion barred insurer’s duty to defend and indemnify
• holding that the insurer did not have a duty to defend or indemnify because the insured admitted that the discharge of liquid waste at the Site was expected or intended from the standpoint of the insured, even though that fact was not alleged in the charging documents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).