Skip to main content
· 5/21/1998

Providence Journal Co. v. Rodgers

Citations

  • 711 A.2d 1131
  • 26 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2025
  • 1998 R.I. LEXIS 169
  • 1998 WL 268305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the Supreme Court will interpret a statute in a manner \that is most consistent with its policy or obvious purpose\
  • \We do not `interpret a legislative enactment literally when to do so would provide a result at odds with its legislative intent.'\
  • “We do not ‘ “interpret a legislative enactment literally when to do so would provide a result at odds with its legislative intent.” ’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Weisberger, Lederberg, Flanders, Goldberg, Bourcier

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.