Providence Journal Co. v. Kane

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that \[a]ny balancing of interests arises only after a record has first been determined to be a public record\
• holding state employee personnel records exempt from disclosures under APRA
• “information that will uniquely identify State employees by name, address, and employment history directly contravenes the clear proscription * * * against disclosure of all records which are identifiable to an individual employee”
• acknowledging \that the basic policy of the APRA favor[s] disclosure\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).