Prout v. Vladeck

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying summary judgment for attorney where there was “a genuine dispute as to whether [the law firm’s] conduct fell within the range of ‘reasonable courses of action’ that would immunize it from malpractice liability” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Espinal v. Goord
  Second Circuit· 2009-02-27· cited 517×
• Allianz Insurance Company v. Regina Lerner
  Second Circuit· 2005-08-02· cited 322×
• Graziadio v. Culinary Institute of America
  Second Circuit· 2016-03-17· cited 238×
• Grant v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
  Second Circuit· 1980-05-22· cited 228×
• Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers
  Supreme Court· 2018-02-21· cited 199×
• Achtman v. Kirby, McInerney & Squire, LLP
  Second Circuit· 2006-09-25· cited 108×
• Schwartz v. Olshan Grundman Frome & Rosenzweig
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2003-01-16· cited 40×
• Prout v. Vladeck
  S.D. Illinois· 2018-06-10· cited 34×
• Kirk v. Heppt
  S.D. New York· 2008-01-09· cited 32×
• Antokol v. Myers
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2006-06-22· cited 22×
• Bonilla v. Abbott
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1985-09-23· cited 14×
• Prout v. Vladeck
  S.D. Illinois· 2018-07-29· cited 11×