Proudfoot v. State Farm Mutual Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[b]ecause the expenses in question were not yet ‘incurred,’ the Court of Appeals erred in ordering defendant to pay the total amount to the trial court” for disbursal to plaintiff as expenses are incurred
• holding that “[b]ecause the expenses in question were not yet ‘incurred,’ the Court of Appeals erred in ordering defendant to pay the total amount to the trial court” for disbursal to plaintiff as expenses are incurred
• in which the plaintiff was required to take actions to become hable for the cost of home modifications necessitated by her injury in order to incur an allowable expense for which the defendant could be hable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).