ProtoComm Corp. v. Novell, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• construing Johnston to hold that “two of the plaintiffs [Johnston and Praught] were not ‘creditors’ under § 174 because they did not have a claim against the company before the merger occurred”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).