Protests 998235-G of W. T. Grant Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the respondent’s obsessive behavior and persistent contacts at the petitioner’s regular coffee shop were not qualifying contacts because they were not threatening in nature and the respondent had no his- tory of violence
• reviewing the trial court’s factual findings for “any evidence” and the court’s legal conclusions for errors of law
• considering the respondent’s lack of vio- lent or threatening history in concluding that his repeated unwelcome contacts did not give rise to an objectively rea- sonable fear for personal safety
• “The term ‘contact’ includes ‘almost any interaction with the petitioner.’ ” (Quoting Christensen, 261 Or App at 140.)
• victim’s subjective alarm must be objectively reasonable “for a person in the victim’s situation”
• “The term contact includes almost any interaction * * *.” (Internal quotation marks omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).