Protests 963323-G of Brier Mfg. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it could not review a 240-month aggregate sentence for dispropor- tionality under Article I, section 16, and instead examining only the individual 120-month sentences
• holding that it could not review a 240-month aggregate sentence for dispropor- tionality under Article I, section 16, and instead examining only the individual 120-month sentences
• refusing to review a 240-month aggregate sentence for disproportionality under Article I, section 16, and instead examining only the individual 120- month sentences
• refusing to review a 240-month aggregate sentence for disproportionality under Article I, section 16, and instead examining only the individual 120- month sentences

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).