Protests 958936-G of B. Shackman & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing McNeely and noting that the Court reaffirmed in that case “that a determination of whether a warrantless, nonconsensual blood draw is constitutional depends upon the totality of the circumstances in each case”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).