Protests 948999-G of Chong Kee Jan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant did not purposefully direct activities at California by “utiliz[ing] accounts on California-headquartered Internet companies Facebook, hi5.com, DeviantArt, and 4Shared to direct traffic to his Websites”
• finding no personal jurisdiction in California where “the advertisements provided by Plaintiffs do not suggest that Defendant targeted California” and “there is no indication that Defendant knew of a California user base or that he exploited that base”
• distinguishing Am. Auto. Ass’n, 2009 WL 13 1066506, at –6, in a case involving copyright infringement of music and holding that personal 14 jurisdiction is not established merely by users’ registering for a commercial website that has 15 infringing content

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).