Protests 935864-G of Greenberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the plaintiffs contention that the Forest Service needed to conduct a “comprehensive environmental assessment of the entire NFTS” because the project was limited to whether it “should allow motorized use on previously unauthorized roads”
• Forest Service was not obligated to show that existing NFTS trails were adopted after NEPA review before making modifications to the NFTS

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).