Protests 92763-K of Geo. Ehlenberger & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “a defendant’s statements may be used to clarify the likely consequences of a nonspeech action”
• noting Cite as 316 Or App 762 (2022) 771 that in “subsequent cases, we have reaffirmed the holding of Cantwell”
• bang- ing on a door and shouting for someone to open it was pri- marily speech

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).