Protests 916744-G of Gimbel Bros.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• declining to reach analysis of plaintiff's as-applied First Amendment claims upon concluding that certain ads were not electioneering communications under the statute
• declining to reach analysis of plaintiff’s as-applied First Amendment claims upon concluding that certain ads were not electioneering communications under the statute
• finding unreviewable an FEC deadlock about whether advertisements constituted prohibited election communications because, unlike deadlocks leading to the dismissal of private complaints, it resulted “only in the FEC concluding that it was unable to reach a determination”
• “Given that three of [the plaintiff’s] five proposed advertisements constitute electioneering communications, it is appropriate next to consider [its] as-applied challenges to the electioneering communication statutes.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).