Protests 88601-K of Ades

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant suffered no prejudice due to the overbroad jury instruction based, in part, on the fact that the prosecutor emphasized the charge, as indicted, in the closing argument
• concluding trial court violated Article VII (Amended), section 5, by instructing the jury that defendant could be convicted of sexual abuse for touching “a sexual or intimate part” of the victim, where defendant was indicted only for touching the victim’s vagina

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).