Protests 87686-K of B. R. Anderson & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \legal reasoning\ based on predicate findings of historical fact \is required to determine whether [a party] violated [a particular administrative rule] by engaging in a * * * knowing misrepresentation\
• “We accept any ‘plausible interpretation’ by an agency of its own administrative rule as long as the interpretation is not ‘inconsistent’ with * * * any other source of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).