Protests 85916-K of Alexander & Baldwin, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that the trial court erred in dismissing the plain- tiff’s common-law wrongful discharge claim
• noting that ORS 659A.199’s express “[r]eference to the employee’s belief indicates a subjective, good faith stan- dard”
• explaining that ORS 659A.199’s express “[r]eference to the employee’s belief indicates a subjective, good faith standard”
• noting that, sinder ORS 659A.230, which prohibits retaliation against employees who “in good faith reported criminal activity [,]” “good faith relates to what the employee knew at the time of the report”
• compar- ing the subjective good faith standard in ORS 659A.199 and ORS 659A.233 with the objective reasonableness standard in ORS 659A.230
• “[W]e conclude that plaintiff pre- sented evidence to create a genuine issue of material fact that he acted with subjective, good faith for purposes of ORS 659A.199.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).