Protests 834491-G of Friedlaender Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a special relationship “is irrelevant to a fraudulent inducement claim”
• where the jury’s verdict “was internally inconsistent with regard to whether plaintiff suffered damages,” the “proper course, under the circumstances, was to resubmit the claim to the jury for clarification”
• in reviewing and reversing on claim that verdict was inconsistent, noting that, “ [i] n Building Structures, the defendant waived any objection to the inconsistency by not asking * * * that the matter be sent back to the jury for clarification”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).