Protests 82424-K of Universal Carloading & Distribg. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• relying on Lotches and holding that the trial court’s failure to give a jury concurrence instruction was plain error
• relying on Lotches and holding that the trial court’s failure to give a jury concurrence instruction was plain error
• relying on Lotches and holding that the trial court’s failure to give a jury concurrence instruction was plain error
• declining to “adopt the state’s rigid position that the court [in Phillips] intended to preclude plain error review” and rejecting the state’s argument that plain error review was unavailable
• holding jury must concur on theory of second-degree robbery
• also noting that there was no “plausible strategic reason for defendant’s failure to seek a concurrence instruc- tion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).