Protests 8135-K/88815 of American Express Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a written order and record could be examined to determine the trial court’s intent when the check-the-box form was plainly susceptible to error (citing State v. Rood, 129 Or App 422, 426, 879 P2d 886 (1994))
• concluding that a written order and record could be examined to determine the trial court’s intent when the check-the-box form was plainly susceptible to error (citing State v. Rood, 129 Or App 422, 426, 879 P2d 886 (1994))
• vacating and remanding for entry of a corrected order of commitment where the trial court made a scriven- er’s error
• vacating and remanding for entry of a corrected order of commitment where the trial court made a scrivener’s error
• vacating and remanding for entry of a corrected order of commitment when error on check box judgment form was clear scriven- er’s error based on the record
• vacating and remanding for entry of a corrected order of commitment when error on check box judgment form was clear scriven- er’s error based on the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).