Skip to main content
· 5/31/1940

Protests 810738-G of Corn Products Refining Co.

Citations

  • 4 Cust. Ct. 503

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \a party cannot conjure up mootness by ceasing the challenged conduct only for practical or strategic reasons-such as avoiding litigation.\
  • noting the 5 “significant public interest in settling the legality of these provisions” of the Idaho abortion 6 statutes and finding “the existence of this interest” was a factor that “suggest[ed] a live 7 controversy”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.