Skip to main content
· 5/31/1940

Protests 808083-G of Cox

Citations

  • 4 Cust. Ct. 503

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that statement in declaration that the cash register counter was ‘accessible’ within 9 the meaning of the ADA is a legal conclusion and thus inadmissible”
  • holding that statement in declaration that the cash register counter was ‘accessible’ within 11 the meaning of the ADA is a legal conclusion and thus inadmissible”
  • finding 17 defendant’s conclusory statements that it “dispute[d]” counter was too high and 18 counter was “accessible” insufficient to create a dispute of material fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.