Protests 798073-G of Bingham & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the trial court erred in focusing “on whether [the] plaintiff was a public figure whose identity could be a matter of public interest”
• concluding that defendants’ conduct arose out of one of the activities described in ORS 31.150(2) irrespective of the conduct alleged to be wrongful and intentional
• concluding that the trial court erred in focusing “on whether [the] plaintiff was a public figure whose identity could be a matter of public interest”
• explaining that conduct “in furtherance of” the exercise of rights protected under paragraph (2)(d) need not be neces- sary to the exercise of those rights
• explaining that conduct “in furtherance of” the exercise of rights protected under paragraph (2)(d) need not be neces- sary to the exercise of those rights
• stating that a news agency's report of a shooting constituted a matter of public interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).