Protests 79802-K (B) of S. S. Kresge Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that evidence of sexual predisposition for a victim is “relevant to prove that the charged act took place, not just to prove that the defendant acted with sexual intent”
• rejecting the same argument, before Zavala had been decided, on the ground that it was inconsistent with McKay
• addressing same two theories of relevance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).