Protests 760305-G of Delapenha

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that plaintiff was “entitled to the reimbursement of the portion of her tips the Restaurant improperly required her to share with the chef”
• acknowledging that “[t]o the extent the federal and state statutes now provide for essentially identical remedies with respect to liquidated damages, it is harder to argue that they are designed to compensate a plaintiff for disparate harms”
• calculating overtime damages at 50 percent of regular rate, per hour worked in excess of 40
• refusing to infer the required connection to interstate commerce simply because a restaurant has sales exceeding $500,000
• calculating unpaid minimum wages by dividing monthly rate by monthly hours of work performed
• “[I]t remains the plaintiffs burden to demonstrate that those uncontroverted allegations, without more, establish the defendant’s liability on each asserted cause of action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).