Skip to main content
· 7/1/1946

Protests 70025-K of Corporacion Argentina de Productores de Carnes

Citations

  • 16 Cust. Ct. 209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that, when the state seizes evi- dence in a warrantless search, “the state has the burden to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that the search was legal and did not violate Article I, section 9”
  • discussing a case in which we held that an officer could seize a bag that the defendant had left in a friend’s car, with the friend’s consent, even if the friend lacked authority to consent to a search of the bag, where the officer recognized the bag itself as evidence of a crime
  • person who boarded horses on another's property did not acquire authority co-equal to property owner's over commonly used portion of premises because property owner had not ceded such authority to boarder

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keefe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.