Protests 69568-K of T. D. Downing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a defendant “cannot retroactively render the officer’s opinion inadmissible by himself eliciting information from (continued...
• jury would not perceive officer’s testimony that the defendant was under the influence of marijuana, based on the officer’s training and experience and the fact that the defendant “had dilated pupils and red, puffy ‘spider web’ eyes,” as “scientific”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).